Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and other writings, of the Wissenschaftslehre — Review of the Journal for truth — Note to “Fichte and Kant”. Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and other writings, / J.G. Fichte ; edited and translated, with an introduction and notes, by Daniel Breazeale. Original title: Erste Einleitung in die Wissenschaftslehre () The present introduction was written by Fichte in , three years after the.
|Published (Last):||13 January 2014|
|PDF File Size:||11.76 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.46 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Hence, on the field of Practical Reason and of Reflective Judgment, this half criticism, lacking the insight into the whole procedure of reason, gropes about as in total darkness. Between andFichte taught at Jena, his Theory of Science laying the ground for the German idealist movement.
Introduction to Fichte’s Science of Knowledge – Wikisource, the free online library
This entry has no external links. Such is the first task imposed upon the student by Philosophy.
Editions Rodopi, ff. Rigorously—and this is the course of consistent dogmatism, which thus becomes materialism;—the soul is to them no Thing at all, and indeed nothing at all, but merely a production, the result of the reciprocal action of Things amongst themselves. Lectures on the Theory of Ethicstrans. You may give this Other even a mechanical power, and it will transfer the received impression to the next link, and thus the movement proceeding from the first may be transferred through as long a series as you choose to make; but nowhere will you find a link which introductione back upon itself.
The theory of right examines how the freedom of each individual must be externally limited if a free society of free and equal introructions is to be possible. Wherever their union has been attempted the members would not fit together, and somewhere an immense gulf appeared which could not be spanned.
For I do not want to trouble him yet with the question, how he knows that they are mere immanent laws of the Intelligence. History of Western Philosophy.
Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and other writings, 1797-1800
FichteJohann Gottlieb Fichte. Either it appears to have been produced by the representation, or as existing without any action of ours; and in the latter case, as either also determined in regard to its qualitativeness, or as existing merely in regard to its existence, while determinable in regard introductlons its qualitativeness by the free intelligence.
When the true identity of its author was revealed, Fichte was immediately catapulted from total obscurity to philosophical celebrity. Perhaps it may be proven after twenty years.
What I have said just now contains the conception of that science, and I shall untroductions to no objections which may touch this conception, since no one can know better than myself what I intend to accomplish, and to demonstrate the impossibility of a thing which is already realized, is ridiculous. You suppose that it is the product of certain factors. The questions intfoductions with within such a philosophy of religion are those concerning the nature, limits, and legitimacy of our belief in divine providence.
So far as this goes, the teacher of Introductionx shows his assertion to be contained in immediate consciousness. But it is also a reflection of the relatively anemic tradition of Fichte scholarship in England and North America, where even the early Wissenschaftslehre has long ficyte neglected and under-appreciated. Following a lengthy sojourn in Zurich, were he met his future wife, Johanna Rahn, Fichte returned to Leipzig with the intention of pursuing a literary career.
Fichte presents an a priori argument for the fundamentally social character of human beings, an argument grounded upon an analysis of the very structure of self-consciousness and the requirements for self-positing. The present introduction was written by Fichte inthree years after the first publication of his full system. Cornell University Press,2nd ed.
Kant helped to have it published in ; the work appeared anonymously, and reviewers thought it was the work of Kant himself. Attempt at a Critique of All Revelationtrans.
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
What can possibly tempt persons who comprehend this—and to comprehend it is so very easy a matter—to prefer the one over the other; and why skepticism, as the total renunciation of an answer to this problem, does not become universal? Whatever is in the Intelligence, whatever the Intelligence is itself, the Intelligence is for itself ; and only in so far as it is this for itself is it this, as Intelligence.
Furthermore, though we must, due to the discursive character of reflection itself, distinguish each of these acts from the others that it is conditioned by and that are, in turn, conditioned by it, none of these individual acts actually occurs in isolation from all of the others.
Hence the object of Idealism has this advantage over the object of Dogmatism, that it is not to be deduced as the explanatory ground of experience—which would be a contradiction, and change this system itself into a part of experience—but that it is, nevertheless, to be pointed out as a part of consciousness; whereas, the object of Dogmatism can pass for nothing but a mere invention, which obtains validity only through the success of the system.
The first such extension was into the realm of philosophy of law and social philosophy, which resulted in the publication Foundations of Natural Right in accordance with the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre published in two volumes in and The power of the cause goes over into an Other opposed to it, and produces therein a Being, and nothing further; a Being for a possible outside Intelligence, but not for the thing itself. Particularly during the long periods preceding, during, and following the two World Wars, Fichte was discussed almost exclusively in the context of German politics and national identity, and his technical philosophy tended to be dismissed as a monstrous or comical speculative aberration of no relevance whatsoever to contemporary philosophy.
A certain number is given to you. Create account or Sign in. They are the laws which are immediately applied to objects and he can only have obtained them by abstraction from these objects, i.
Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Writings
I should be sorry if they understood me. From the view of Idealism, the Intelligence is a Doingand absolutely nothing else; it is even wrong to call it an Activesince this expression points to something existing, in which the activity is inherent.
If the presupposition of Idealism is correct, and if no errors have been made in the deduction, the last result, as containing all the conditions of the first act, must contain the system of all necessary representations, or the total experience;—a comparison, however, which is not instituted in Philosophy itself, but only after that science has finished its work.
Or somebody might say: Hitherto this wish of mine has been realized; and I hope, even now, that these present lines will so confuse them that they can perceive nothing more in them than mere words, while that which represents their mind is torn hither and thither by their ill-concealed rage.
Hence, if it is not to be so understood, the possibility of Philosophy, as we have described it, must be altogether denied, and such a denial we have replied to in our first section. Fichte then planned to extend his system into the realm of philosophy of religion.
All you have to do is search for the product of these factors according to the well-known rules. Until then, it remains a mere hypothesis that the principle of human freedom, for all of its practical certainty, is also the proper starting point for a transcendental account of objective experience.
I am therefore compelled to repeat what I have said, and to recall to mind that everything depends upon the correct understanding thereof. Both see the same, only in a different manner.
This is a limitation to the freedom of the thought process, which allows constraint to be viewed and moves the I into the realm of the consciousness. The Thing in itself is a mere invention, and has no reality at all. Now the representation of the introdcutions of the Ego and that of the Thing can very well exist together but not the independence itself of both. Transcendental philosophy is thus an effort to analyze what is in fact the single, synthetic act through which the I posits for itself both itself and its wisssenschaftslehre, thereby becoming aware in a single moment of both its freedom and its limitations, its infinity and its finitude.